21 September 2014
During a routine inspection
The focus of the inspection was to answer five key questions; is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led? Below is a summary of what we found. If you want to see the evidence that supports our summary please read the full report.
Is the service safe?
We found that the service were safe. People said or indicated that they felt safe. People told us that they could tell staff if there was a problem and that they were confident help would be provided.
People were supported in an environment that was safe, clean and hygienic. Equipment at the home had been well maintained and serviced regularly. There were enough staff on duty to meet the needs of the people living at the home and staff said management provided supervision, and was in direct contact with the home and team most days. The staff said provider was easy to speak with and that it was possible to raise concerns. There were evacuation plans and systems in place in the event of a fire, and the service specific risk assessment had been reviewed by a professional consultant in June 2014.
Is the service effective?
People were involved in their assessment and care planning. Relatives or care managers were involved in helping people have a say where needed.
Environmental checks for the safety of the premises were taking place monthly and there was a system for staff to report any concerns. The provider made sure any maintenance issues were resolved without delay. People were able to choose what meals to have and the providers kept records to monitor that people had sufficient nutrition.
Is the service caring?
People told us that they felt well cared for, one person said 'I like this place, it's more caring'. People were observed to be treated respectfully.
All four people appeared relaxed and happy in the company of staff. We observed that where people had communication difficulties, they were confident to lead staff to give them the support they needed.
Is the service responsive?
People's needs had been assessed before they moved into the home. People's likes and dislikes were noted, and as they changed, the records were updated. The providers observed and recorded people's changing behaviour and sought specialist help to adjust the type of support provided. We saw staff responded promptly to people's requests.
Is the service well led?
The staff members we spoke with said that the provider was focused on helping staff provide good quality support to the people living at the service at all times. The people living at the home said the manager helped sort out important events, such as holidays and reviews. Surveys had been sent out to people's relatives and care managers but none had been returned. The service had not received any complaints.