17 January 2013
During a routine inspection
The home had been registered to provide personal care for 13 people. When we visited ten people were living there. Some people had dementia and were unable to discuss their care with us; other people wanted to talk to us about their experiences. We talked with two people who lived at House on the Hill and with relatives who were visiting two other people that day. We gained a mixed picture of the care people received. One person told us the care was, “Terrible”. Another person told us they, “Could be warmer”. However the relatives we spoke with told us that staff at House on the Hill were very caring and that they were, “Happy” and “Very satisfied” with the care given.
We found there were enough qualified and experienced staff to provide care. We are waiting to confirm how many staff have attended training in protecting vulnerable adults. We are also waiting to understand more about safeguarding allegations made by two people who live at the home. We saw that improvements had been made to the building and to the quality assurance systems in the home since the temporary provider has been responsible for people’s care.