• Doctor
  • GP practice

Horizon Healthcare

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Catherine House 2b, Stoughton Drive North, Leicester, LE5 5UB (0116) 319 0343

Provided and run by:
Horizon Healthcare

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

11 August 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced inspection at Horizon Healthcare on 11 August 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

At our previous inspection on 29 July 2021, the practice was rated Good overall and for the key questions of effective, caring, responsive and well-led, but was rated as requires improvement for providing safe services. In addition, it was rated as requires improvement for the population group of long-term conditions within the effective key question (the effective key question however was rated as good overall).

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Horizon Healthcare on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection.

This inspection in August 2022 was a focused review of information including a site visit to follow up on the regulatory breach notice issued after the 2021 inspection.

We inspected elements of the safe and effective key questions which led to the regulatory breach in 2021, and also the areas identified as ‘shoulds’ for the provider to action at the previous inspection.

The previous ratings for the key questions of effective, caring and well-led are carried forward from the previous inspection. Population groups are no longer rated individually, so we reviewed the previous requires improvement rating for people with a long-term condition within the effective key question.

The key question of safe is now rated good and the overall rating of good remains unchanged. Whilst we did not rate the effective key question, we observed that the practice had addressed our concerns relating to long-term condition management. In addition, they had undertaken a range of interventions to improve the uptake of childhood vaccinations and cervical screening, although work remained ongoing to meet national targets.

However, we have rated the key question of responsive as requires improvement as the branch surgery’s facilities and premises were not of an appropriate standard for the services being delivered to patients.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing remote clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider to be submitted electronically
  • A short site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm. The practice had developed effective systems to monitor patients prescribed high-risk medicines and to review medicines safety alerts.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs. The service had good systems to identify patients at risk of developing diabetes and supported them via treatment and education programmes.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way. However, the branch site required extensive refurbishment work to improve the environment and adhere to best practice in infection prevention and control guidance.

We found one breach of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure all premises and equipment used by the service provider is fit for use.

In addition, the provider should:

  • Develop a protocol to reduce the duration of repeat issues of high risk medicines to try and gain improved compliance from the patient.
  • Continue to increase the uptake of childhood immunisations and cervical screening.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

29 July 2021

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at Horizon Healthcare on 29 July 2021. This was the first inspection of the provider since the main surgery moved to its new location.

Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

Safe – Requires improvement

Effective - Good

Caring – Not inspected

Responsive – Not inspected

Well-led - Good

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Horizon Healthcare on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a focused inspection to follow up on the areas of improvement identified at the last inspection in October 2019 and the ratings awarded in the safe, effective and well-led key questions. We reviewed the breach of regulation which had been identified at the last inspection in relation to good governance and to check the provider had made the improvements we said should be made.

We inspected the key questions of safe, effective and well-led at this inspection.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using telephone and video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider to be submitted electronically.
  • A short site visit.
  • To ensure we gathered staff feedback we used a questionnaire which was sent to staff electronically via email.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall and good for all population groups, except the people with long-term conditions population group which was rated as requires improvement.

We found that:

  • The practice did not always provide care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

We found one breach of regulation. The provider must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The provider should:

  • Continue their review of the branch surgery premises to ensure the environment fully meets the needs of their patients.
  • Continue their work to improve childhood immunisation and cervical screening uptake figures.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care