CQC tells Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to make improvements to maternity services

Published: 8 March 2024 Page last updated: 8 March 2024
Categories
Media

The Care Quality Commission (CQC), has downgraded the rating of Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust maternity services from good to requires improvement, following an inspection in September.

This inspection was carried out as part of CQC’s national maternity services inspection programme. The programme aims to provide an up-to-date view of the quality of hospital maternity care across the country, and a better understanding of what is working well to support learning and improvement locally and nationally.

Great Western Hospital in Swindon provides maternity services to the population of Swindon, Wiltshire, and the surrounding areas.

The overall rating for maternity services at Great Western Hospital has dropped from good to requires improvement. How well-led the service is has declined from good to requires improvement. The rating for how safe the service is has also dropped from good to requires improvement. This inspection didn’t rate how effective, caring, and responsive the service is.

The overall rating for the hospital remains requires improvement. The overall rating for the trust remains good.

Carolyn Jenkinson, CQC’s deputy director of secondary and specialist healthcare, said:

“When we inspected maternity services at Great Western Hospital, we found a deterioration in the level of care being provided to women, people using the service and their babies. Leaders weren’t acting quickly when issues were found, and this was putting people at risk of harm.

“Local leaders had poor systems and processes in place and lacked urgency to address risks. Inspectors saw there was a risk around transferring care records to a new system that’d been raised at previous inspections. We saw there still hadn’t been actions to address this at our most recent inspection. Other risks raised by CQC at the previous inspection had also not been addressed, such as a ventilation concern with one of the rooms often used as a second operating theatre.

“Staff weren’t always escalating incidents to other agencies or marking them as severely as they should have been. People had experienced 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears and bleeding during birth, but these had been downgraded in severity, which meant they were not investigated as thoroughly as they should’ve been to keep people safe.

“We also found staff didn’t always assess people when they arrived or note how urgently they needed support. This meant people weren’t always seen in order of clinical need and staff could miss if someone’s condition worsened. However, the trust started to make improvements to this following inspector feedback.

“Staffing levels weren’t always safe, and the service was short-staffed during the inspection, although the trust has filled some vacancies since then. Staff had raised concerns with leaders that this had led to delays in treating people who needed their labour induced. There was also high levels of staff sickness and inspectors were told this was due to stress.

“However, we found that staff were doing their best to provide good care despite the challenging circumstances and worked well together as a team. Leaders also recognised that improvements needed to be made to the service and had started to work on this.

“We will continue to monitor the trust, including through future inspections, to ensure the issues we identified are addressed so women, people using the service and their babies receive the best possible care.”

Inspectors also found:

  • Staff hadn’t all completed mandatory training in order to identify and protect people from abuse and manage safely well
  • Record-keeping wasn’t always consistent or fully completed. Staff updated both paper and electronic notes and there was a lack of clarity as to where staff could find information
  • Leaders weren’t effectively monitoring how the service performed and acting quickly to address issues and risks. Leaders didn’t always address risks which the service was aware of in a timely manner
  • Women and people using the service didn’t always know where they could go for urgent help about a pregnancy. However, the trust showed inspectors proposals to address this with a streamlined contact system which may be put in place.

However,

  • The service was working to tackle health inequalities in the local area and had engaged with a local university to train staff in Black Maternity Matters
  • The environment was well-maintained, and the service managed infection risks well.

About the Care Quality Commission

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and social care in England.

We make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve.

We monitor, inspect and regulate services to make sure they meet fundamental standards of quality and safety and we publish what we find to help people choose care.