13 December 2016
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Northcote House Surgery on 13 December 2016. This inspection was a follow up to our previous comprehensive inspection at the practice in April 2016 where breaches of regulation had been identified. The practice was rated as inadequate for the domains of safe and well led, requires improvement in the domain of effective and good in the caring and responsive domains. The overall rating of the practice following the April 2016 inspection was inadequate and the practice was placed into special measures for a period of six months.
We also issued a warning notice to the practice to inform them where improvements were needed in relation to good governance. A visit was undertaken on 5 August 2016 where we saw that the specific improvements had been made.
At our inspection on 13 December 2016 we found that the practice had improved. The ratings for the practice have been updated to reflect our recent findings. The practice is rated as good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led services.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
- Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
- Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
- Feedback from patients about their care was positive. Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment. Data from the National GP Patient Survey published in July 2016 showed that patients rated the practice in line with others for most aspects of care.
- Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
- The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt well supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
- The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
The area where the provider should make an improvement is:
- Proactively identify carers so that these patients receive appropriate support and care.
- Ensure that a comprehensive schedule of clinical meetings is in place.
I confirm that this practice has improved sufficiently to be rated good overall. This practice will be removed from special measures.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice