6, 7 August 2013
During a routine inspection
We visited four people in their homes and we also spoke with four people on the telephone. We met two care workers during our visits to people's homes and we spoke with three care workers on the telephone. We visited the agency office where we spoke with the registered manager and a senior member of staff with responsibility for training. We looked at records held in the agency office including care plans, medication administration records, staff rotas, staff training records and systems used to monitor the quality of the service.
People we spoke with and visited told us the agency provided a good service. Comments included 'Really, really good', 'The service is excellent. They have such a lovely group of people who work for them' and 'They are definitely doing a good job. It's marvellous to have carers who understand strokes.' However, there was a risk people may experience missed visits due to weaknesses in the way the agency planned care worker's rotas each week. We also found some people did not have an up to date copy of their care plan in their homes and some care plans did not provide sufficient information about the person's care needs.
Most people who needed care staff to administer their medicines received their medicines safely. However, some unexplained gaps in the administration records meant people may be at risk of not receiving their medicines as prescribed. Some care workers had not received adequate training on the safe administration of medicines.
The agency did not have robust systems in place to seek people's views on the service and identify any areas where improvements were necessary.