• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Copse Lane Dental Surgery

Copse Lane, Hamble, Southampton, Hampshire, SO31 4QH (023) 8045 7646

Provided and run by:
Mr. Reginald Gyening

All Inspections

27 April 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 27 April 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Copse Lane Dental Surgery is in Hamble and provides NHS and private treatment to patients of all ages.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including one for blue badge holders, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes four dentists, two dental nurses, one dental hygienist, one practice manager/dental nurse, one locum dental nurse and two receptionists. The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Copse Lane Dental Surgery was the principal dentist.

On the day of inspection we collected 24 CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with six other patients.

During the inspection we spoke with Three dentists, two dental nurses, one locum dental nurse, two receptionists and the practice manager/dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday 8am to 5.30pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The practice was providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership and culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The practice had suitable information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice's policy and the storage of products identified under Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) 2002 Regulations to ensure a risk assessment is undertaken and the products are stored securely.
  • Review the practice's protocols for monitoring and recording the fridge temperature to ensure that medicines and dental care products are being stored in line with the manufacturer’s guidance.
  • Review the practice’s systems for assessing, monitoring and mitigating the various risks arising from the undertaking of the regulated activities, in particular lone working by the dental hygienist.
  • Review the fire safety risk assessment and ensure that any actions required are complete and ongoing fire safety management is effective.

6 June 2013

During a routine inspection

Patients that used the dental practice told us they were satisfied with the service they received. They described it as 'very good', 'pretty good' and 'very satisfactory'. Patients said they were given enough information about their treatment and options available to them. They were given time to make decisions about their treatment. Treatment was delivered according to the agreed plans and they received appropriate follow-up information. One patient said they were 'quite happy' with the treatment they received. Another said they had 'no complaints'. They told us the practice was clean and hygienic, staff were polite and respectful, and the receptionists were friendly and put them at their ease.

We found that people were involved in and understood the care and treatment choices available to them. They experienced effective, safe and appropriate care and treatment. Patients were cared for in a clean and hygienic environment. The provider was carrying out the necessary checks before staff started work and was supporting staff to provide the required level of service. There were effective systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that patients received.