The state of care in independent online primary health services

Published: 23 March 2018 Page last updated: 12 May 2022

This publication presents findings from our programme of inspections of primary health care services provided online in the independent sector, such as those that provide GP consultations and prescriptions through websites and apps.

The state of care in independent online primary health services cover image

The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving presenting new and innovative ways to deliver healthcare.

In the future, the delivery of healthcare online has the potential to play a major part in how healthcare is provided. We encourage innovation but it must never come at the expense of quality.

As with all healthcare services, patient safety must be at the heart of all decisions around what kind of care is offered and how it is delivered.

As providers continue to evolve, we will work alongside the people who use online services, those who provide them and our regulatory partners to encourage improvement, stay abreast of technological developments, and refine our regulatory approach.


What we did

Since November 2016, we have inspected every company in England that provides online primary care services for people in this country.

We assessed each company that provides these services against five key areas – whether they are safe, caring, effective, responsive to people’s needs and well-led.

We did this by inspecting the provider’s registered location, reviewing its systems and policies, and examining how it delivers its care. We also analysed the information that we hold about each provider. This could include feedback from people who have used or have come into contact with its services.

Our inspectors asked questions about how the service makes sure they know the identity of the patient and how the patient’s NHS GP is kept informed of any treatment.

What we found

Although there are contextual differences to consider between services delivered remotely and in person, the fundamentals of good clinical practice apply. At the end of our inspection programme, we found:

  • 97% of the providers were meeting the regulations around being ‘caring’
  • 90% of the providers were meeting the regulations around being ‘responsive’ to people’s needs

Safety is where we found the greatest concerns but also where we have seen the greatest improvement.

In February 2018 we found that 43% of the providers were not providing ‘safe’ care according to the relevant regulations. This was an improvement from the first inspections when we found that 86% were not fully meeting these regulations.

Our specific concerns included:

  • inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and prescribing high volumes of opioid-based medicines without talking to the patient’s registered GP
  • unsatisfactory approaches to safeguarding children and those who may not have the mental capacity to understand or consent to a consultation
  • not collecting patient information or sharing information with a patient’s NHS GP
  • inappropriate prescribing of medicines for long-term conditions

Some providers were able to address issues on the day of inspection by, for example, deciding not to prescribe certain medicines or by introducing new policies.

We will continue to hold these providers to account and will share the good practice we find in order to encourage further improvement.